ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Warren F. Witzig, Sunil D. Weerakkody
Nuclear Technology | Volume 78 | Number 1 | July 1987 | Pages 24-33
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A34005
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Past experiences such as the Bhopal incident in India (1985) and the Chernobyl reactor accident in the USSR (April 1986) stress the significance of timely evacuations as a protective measure against accidental releases of radioactivity or toxic material to the atmosphere. While timely evacuation has the potential to save many lives, there is a finite risk associated with the act of evacuation itself. From a detailed questionnaire, data were obtained on 320 past evacuation events that took place in the United States from 1972 to 1985 to quantify risks associated with evacuations. Subsequently, these risks are used to assess the societal impact associated with evacuations of sectors of different radii surrounding a nuclear power plant. It is found that risks associated with evacuation of a 16-km radius to be ∼100 times greater than the risks associated with a 3.2-km radius evacuation. Also, an individual’s fatality risk due to evacuation is found to be equal to the risk attributed to a radiation dose between 110 and 5800 mrem (0.0011 and 0.058 Gy), depending on the dose response model used to assess the radiation risk for a 320-km round-trip evacuation. This concept can be applied to nonnuclear incidents such as rail accidents and other industrial or natural incidents.