ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
MARVEL team shares lessons learned through microreactor development
On June 1 at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., a team from Idaho National Laboratory presented a session titled “Lessons Learned from MARVEL Reactor Fabrication.” The presentation highlighted challenges that arose as they moved from design to manufacturing and assembly, with a focus on reactor part fabrication, Stirling engine implementation, and reactivity control system development.
Warren F. Witzig, Sunil D. Weerakkody
Nuclear Technology | Volume 78 | Number 1 | July 1987 | Pages 24-33
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A34005
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Past experiences such as the Bhopal incident in India (1985) and the Chernobyl reactor accident in the USSR (April 1986) stress the significance of timely evacuations as a protective measure against accidental releases of radioactivity or toxic material to the atmosphere. While timely evacuation has the potential to save many lives, there is a finite risk associated with the act of evacuation itself. From a detailed questionnaire, data were obtained on 320 past evacuation events that took place in the United States from 1972 to 1985 to quantify risks associated with evacuations. Subsequently, these risks are used to assess the societal impact associated with evacuations of sectors of different radii surrounding a nuclear power plant. It is found that risks associated with evacuation of a 16-km radius to be ∼100 times greater than the risks associated with a 3.2-km radius evacuation. Also, an individual’s fatality risk due to evacuation is found to be equal to the risk attributed to a radiation dose between 110 and 5800 mrem (0.0011 and 0.058 Gy), depending on the dose response model used to assess the radiation risk for a 320-km round-trip evacuation. This concept can be applied to nonnuclear incidents such as rail accidents and other industrial or natural incidents.