ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Kazuki Hida, Sadao Kusuno, Takeshi Seino
Nuclear Technology | Volume 75 | Number 2 | November 1986 | Pages 148-159
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT86-A33857
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effects of 232U and 236U on uranium recycling in boiling water reactors are studied with the two-dimensional lattice physics code TGBLA. A simple analytic expression is proposed for reactivity compensation factor K, taking into account the self-shielding effect of resonance absorption in 236U: K = a + b/ (1 + ce6)1/2, where e6 denotes the 236U concentration. To output the same energy as the 3.0 wt% enrichment fuel free from 236U, the constants are determined to be a = 0.06, b = 0.23, and c = 1.9. The introduction of 1 ppb 232U increases the surface dose rate of the fuel assembly by 60% over the aged enriched natural uranium. Lead time is as important as cooling time in 232U production because of the presence of the chain that originates from the alpha decay of naturally occurring 234U. The natural uranium feed and the separative work requirement are evaluated on these bases, introducing typical recycling strategies, and it appears that uranium recycling saves 17 to 19% of the natural uranium but increases the separative work by 0 to 2%. The front-end cost analysis reveals the benefit of a concentrated utilization of reprocessed uranium, which results from the self-shielding effect of 236U and the assumption of a linear dependence of the front-end penalty on 232U concentration. Also studied are plutonium composition in irradiated fuels and the effects of extended burnup.