ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Samuel Carmona, Shimon Yiftah
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 289-295
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33727
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Complete evaluations of the (n,2n) and (n,3n) reaction cross sections were carried out for the stable isotopes of lead and for natural lead, that element being a potential neutron amplifier for fusion blankets. The method of computation used is based on the Segev simple formalism for compound nucleus decay without branching. This method, which was already checked for 204Pb, was used for cross-section computation for all other stable lead isotopes. From these results, evaluated cross sections could be derived for natural lead. The results of the evaluations were in good agreement with experimental data. Small discrepancies with the measured data for 204Pb, 207Pb, and 208Pb at low excitation energies above threshold are overcome through the introduction of an “effective” threshold energy slightly higher than the real one. This single correction is sufficient for matching the shape of the evaluated curves to the measured data over the entire energy range for the second neutron emission.