ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
MARVEL team shares lessons learned through microreactor development
On June 1 at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., a team from Idaho National Laboratory presented a session titled “Lessons Learned from MARVEL Reactor Fabrication.” The presentation highlighted challenges that arose as they moved from design to manufacturing and assembly, with a focus on reactor part fabrication, Stirling engine implementation, and reactivity control system development.
Dirk Wilhelm, Leonhard Meyer
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 162-172
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33717
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The flow dynamics in the upper core structure (UCS) during the expansion phase of a liquid-metal fast breeder reactor core disruptive accident were investigated experimentally and numerically. A simulant material experiment was designed to verify some of the thermal-hydraulic models in SIMMER-II. The experiments showed the large effect of the heat transfer in the UCS and the relatively small effect of friction. The reduction of the work potential of the expanding fuel by the presence of the UCS is shown as a function of the initial pressure and the temperature difference between the core and the UCS, both for simulant materials and UO2 fuel. It is described how the experimental data can be extrapolated to prototypical conditions, which phenomena modeled in the code predictions of SIMMER-II are different for simulant and prototypical transients, and how the experimental results compare to effects of prototypical phenomena that could not be modeled in the experiment.