ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
MARVEL team shares lessons learned through microreactor development
On June 1 at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., a team from Idaho National Laboratory presented a session titled “Lessons Learned from MARVEL Reactor Fabrication.” The presentation highlighted challenges that arose as they moved from design to manufacturing and assembly, with a focus on reactor part fabrication, Stirling engine implementation, and reactivity control system development.
Richard W. Smith, Gary S. Was
Nuclear Technology | Volume 69 | Number 2 | May 1985 | Pages 198-209
Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33631
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The FCODE-BETA/SS code, based on the Electric Power Research Institute’s FCODE-BETA, is constructed to model the thermal-mechanical performance of Type 304 stainless steel clad pressurized water reactor fuel rods. Specifically, thermal expansion, thermal conductivity, irradiation creep, temperature-dependent material parameters and gap conductance for Type 304 stainless steel clad fuel rods are modeled. FCODEBETA/SS is benchmarked against end-oflife fission gas release and creep strain data from Connecticut Yankee fuel rods. Benchmarking results on key performance variables are comparable to those of FCODEBETA and COMETHE. Using FCODE-BETA/SS to compare the performance of Type 304 stainless steel and Zircaloy clad fuel over a common power history reveals that Type 304 stainless steel clad rods display higher fuel temperatures, wider gaps, and longer times to gap closure than Zircaloy clad rods. The stainless steel cladding spends only a small fraction of life in a state of tensile stress at the ridge, but the magnitudes of these ridge stresses are significantly greater than those found in Zircaloy rods. Nevertheless, the thermal performance of the two rod types is very similar.