ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Erik Johansson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 68 | Number 2 | February 1985 | Pages 263-268
Technical Note | Fabrication of Components of the Creys-Malville Plant / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33559
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The recycling of plutonium in close-packed pressurized water reactor (PWR) lattices, leading to a higher conversion ratio than recycling in a normal lattice, has been studied by calculations. These calculations were performed with the multigroup cell and assembly transport theory code CASMO. This code, widely used for normal light water reactor (LWR) lattices, was tested for close-packed ones by calculations on experiments. The outcome of these tests was reasonably good for the parameters of greatest importance in close-packed plutonium-recycle lattices. Subsequently, the code was applied to an LWR system containing PWRs with such lattices. The emphasis in this application was on the net consumption of natural uranium and separative work. In an asymptotic (steady-state) situation for the close-packed lattice case, these amounts turned out to be ∼35% below the corresponding ones for plutonium recycling in a normal lattice.