ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
ANS panel discussion looks at nuclear’s place in maritime, energy, medicine, space
The applications of nuclear energy extend beyond providing power to the electrical grid. Advanced nuclear technologies may soon have new applications in oil and gas facilities, in hospitals and clinics, on the open seas, and on the moon.
A June 1 executive session, “How Nuclear Technologies will Shape the Future Energy Economy,” at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference allowed experts have an open discussion on the future of nuclear advancements in multiple sectors.
Erik Johansson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 68 | Number 2 | February 1985 | Pages 263-268
Technical Note | Fabrication of Components of the Creys-Malville Plant / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33559
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The recycling of plutonium in close-packed pressurized water reactor (PWR) lattices, leading to a higher conversion ratio than recycling in a normal lattice, has been studied by calculations. These calculations were performed with the multigroup cell and assembly transport theory code CASMO. This code, widely used for normal light water reactor (LWR) lattices, was tested for close-packed ones by calculations on experiments. The outcome of these tests was reasonably good for the parameters of greatest importance in close-packed plutonium-recycle lattices. Subsequently, the code was applied to an LWR system containing PWRs with such lattices. The emphasis in this application was on the net consumption of natural uranium and separative work. In an asymptotic (steady-state) situation for the close-packed lattice case, these amounts turned out to be ∼35% below the corresponding ones for plutonium recycling in a normal lattice.