ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Klaus Penndorf, Frank Schult, Dietrich BüNemann
Nuclear Technology | Volume 59 | Number 2 | November 1982 | Pages 256-269
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A33029
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Maximum conversion ratios of Pu/U mixtures in a pressurized water reactor (PWR)-like open rod lattice core are assessed complying with established data of thermal design, allowing for agreeable discharge burnup values, and utilizing plutonium from PWRs with present time fuel management or with that expected for the near future. Void reactivity, temperature coefficients, and control rod requirements are discussed with respect to their compatibility with the usual PWR design principles. While the temperature coefficients show a completely satisfying behavior, the core control requirements lead to design inconveniences, which nevertheless can be overcome. A crucial constraint, however, is the void reactivity, which limits the specific plutonium content. From the economical point of view, high conversion fuel cycles are penalized by high fissile inventories but promoted by low net consumption of fissile material as well as by low specific reprocessing expenditures.