ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Richard Simms, George S. Stanford, Charles L. Fink, James P. Regis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 55 | Number 3 | December 1981 | Pages 594-600
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32804
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactivity feedback from fuel relocation is a central issue in the analysis of a loss-of-flow (LOF) accident in a liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR). Fuel relocation has been the subject of a number of LOF simulations in the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT). In this study, the results of these tests are analyzed using, as the principal figure of merit, the changes in equivalent fuel worth associated with the fuel motion. The equivalent fuel worth was obtained from the measured axial fuel distributions by weighting the data with a typical LMFBR fuel worth function. At nominal power, the initial fuel relocation resulted in increases in equivalent fuel worth. Above nominal power, the fuel motion was mildly dispersive, but the dispersive driving forces could not unequivocally be identified.