ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
ANS panel discussion looks at nuclear’s place in maritime, energy, medicine, space
The applications of nuclear energy extend beyond providing power to the electrical grid. Advanced nuclear technologies may soon have new applications in oil and gas facilities, in hospitals and clinics, on the open seas, and on the moon.
A June 1 executive session, “How Nuclear Technologies will Shape the Future Energy Economy,” at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference allowed experts have an open discussion on the future of nuclear advancements in multiple sectors.
L. F. Hansen, C. Wong, T. T. Komoto, B. A. Pohl, R. J. Howerton
Nuclear Technology | Volume 51 | Number 1 | November 1980 | Pages 70-77
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32557
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Spherical assemblies of copper with radii (R) equal to 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mean-free-paths (mfp) for 14-MeV neutrons, niobium (R = 0.9 and 3.2 mfp), 232Th (R = 1.0 mfp), and 238U (R = 1.0 and 3.1 mfp) have been bombarded with a centered nominal 14-MeV neutron source. The neutron leakage spectra have been measured from 0.8 to 14 MeV using a stilbene scintillator, time-of-flight techniques, pulse-shape discrimination and ∼10-m flight paths. The measured spectra are compared with calculations carried out with TARTNP, a coupled neutron-photon Monte Carlo transport code, using the ENDF/B-IV and -V neutron libraries. For copper and 238U, the reevaluated cross sections at ∼14 MeV in ENDF/B-V are somewhat less satisfactory in fitting the experimental results than those in ENDF/B-IV. For 232Th, ENDF/B-V shows significant improvement. The niobium cross sections, which were not reevaluated between ENDF/B-IV and -V, provide poor fits to the measurements.