ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
R. Bullough, M. H. Wood
Nuclear Technology | Volume 50 | Number 2 | September 1980 | Pages 164-168
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32542
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several recent papers have investigated the effect of ignoring bulk recombination in derivations of the sink strengths required for the rate theory of void swelling, irradiation creep, and growth. Although most of this work has concluded that bulk recombination can safely be neglected in such procedures, some uncertainty remains. Numerical calculations to eliminate this uncertainty have been made that compare explicit spatial grid and continuum representations of a thin foil, and are performed for irradiation growth in zirconium. It is found that the growth strain predicted using the continuum foil sink strength, derived without bulk recombination, is always within ∼20% of the spatial result and is usually in much closer agreement.