ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
John F. Carew, David J. Diamond
Nuclear Technology | Volume 50 | Number 3 | October 1980 | Pages 252-256
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32528
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An evaluation of the relationship between operating limit uncertainty allowance and fuel performance has been made. A simple analytic relation between uncertainty allowance and the number of fuel rods exceeding fuel limits due to measurement uncertainties has been derived. An evaluation of this relation for selected and bounding power distributions indicates that the expected fraction of the core challenging fuel limits is strongly dependent on (a) the operating power distribution and (b) the estimates of measurement uncertainties used in determining the operating limit uncertainty allowance. Also, the various (1-sigma, 2-sigma, 95/95, etc.) criteria used in selecting uncertainty allowance are found to differ significantly in terms of the number of rods that exceed fuel limits.