ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Shu-Chien Yung, Norman P. Wilburn
Nuclear Technology | Volume 47 | Number 1 | January 1980 | Pages 23-38
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32409
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Intrasubassembly incoherencies affecting the fuel pin failure pattern within a fast test reactor (FTR) subassembly during an unprotected transient overpower/hypothetical core disruptive accident have been investigated using the COBRA-III/MELT code. Two dominant intrasubassembly incoherencies in an FTR subassembly were studied, namely, (a) the hydraulic effect, or the variation in pin-power-to-effective-coolant ratio between pins in the inner region and those in the outer region of the sub-assembly, and (b) the power skew, or variation in pinwise power density for pins throughout the subassembly. The hydraulic effect study concluded that a one-pin representation as used in SAS3A and MELT-IIIA does not represent the fuel pin failure characteristic of any pin in the inner or outer region of the subassembly, but only the failure characteristic of some hypothetical “average” pin, which generally fails much later than most of the pins that actually would fail in the subassembly during the postulated accident. From the power-skew study, it was found that the domain of fuel pin failure times is further widened by the power-skew incoherency. A widened domain of failure times can alleviate molten fuel/coolant interaction by not squirting molten fuel into all coolant subchannels simultaneously. The power skew also produces an eccentric failure pattern within the subassembly that reduces the possibility of a complete fuel blockage.