ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
H. F. MacDonald, S. Nair
Nuclear Technology | Volume 42 | Number 3 | March 1979 | Pages 353-361
Technical Note | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32193
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Central Electricity Generating Board reactor inventory code RICE has been used to calculate the buildup of activity and radioactive emissions for a range of alternative fuel cycles based on a conceptual high-temperature gas-cooled reactor design. The fuels included in this study were a conventional 235U-enriched oxide fuel, a mixed PuO2/UO2 fuel employing pressurized water reactor plutonium, and both low- and high-enrichment mixed 235UO2/ThO2 fuels. The results have been used to quantify the radiological protection implications of these fuel cycles in terms of fuel handling and reprocessing waste management. Some of the thorium fuels investigated have distinct advantages compared with those employing recycled plutonium in terms of both reduced neutron dose rates and long-term alpha decay heating. However, this is at the expense of enhanced gamma dose rates during the fabrication and handling of fresh 233U fuels. These gamma emissions build up with time and require rapid fabrication and return of fuel to the reactor following irradiated fuel reprocessing. The hazards associated with fuel reprocessing wastes are dominated by fission product isotopes over the first few centuries and are similar for U/Pu and thorium fuel cycles. The reduced hazards associated with the actinide component of thorium fuels are only advantageous in waste management schemes involving separate treatment of fission products and actinides.