ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
GAO report describes cleanup progress at Moab Mill Site
A new report released by the U.S. Government Accountability Office states that the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management (EM) has disposed of more than 16 million tons of radioactive and hazardous waste from the Moab Mill Site. While cleanup continues at the Cold War–era uranium ore processing site in southeastern Utah, a plan for the next phase of groundwater remediation is still needed, according to the GAO.
L. Green, J. T. Kriese, M. Natelson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 32 | Number 2 | February 1977 | Pages 186-204
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31723
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactivity perturbation method has been investigated as a possible technique for the assay of spent fuel rods from a 233UO2-ThO2-fueled core. A hard interrogating spectrum was provided at the center of the ARMF-1 core by two B4C filters of different thickness. Rods up to 267 cm (2.67 m) long were pulled through the core at speeds up to 25 cm/min (4.17 × 10−2 m/s), and the time-integrated reactivity worth was measured. The fuel response of both filters was found to be linear over a wide fuel density range, with good fuel sensitivity. Fission product sensitivities for the two filters, obtained both experimentally and calculationally, were very low and in good agreement with one another. Single-measurement uncertainty was 0.6 g at the 25 cm/min (4.17 × 10−3 m/s) pulling speed. Total estimated assay precision, including both systematic and random errors, for a hypothetical assay of 500 rods was ∼0.5%.