ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
L. Green, J. T. Kriese, M. Natelson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 32 | Number 2 | February 1977 | Pages 186-204
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31723
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactivity perturbation method has been investigated as a possible technique for the assay of spent fuel rods from a 233UO2-ThO2-fueled core. A hard interrogating spectrum was provided at the center of the ARMF-1 core by two B4C filters of different thickness. Rods up to 267 cm (2.67 m) long were pulled through the core at speeds up to 25 cm/min (4.17 × 10−2 m/s), and the time-integrated reactivity worth was measured. The fuel response of both filters was found to be linear over a wide fuel density range, with good fuel sensitivity. Fission product sensitivities for the two filters, obtained both experimentally and calculationally, were very low and in good agreement with one another. Single-measurement uncertainty was 0.6 g at the 25 cm/min (4.17 × 10−3 m/s) pulling speed. Total estimated assay precision, including both systematic and random errors, for a hypothetical assay of 500 rods was ∼0.5%.