ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
L. Green, J. T. Kriese, M. Natelson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 32 | Number 2 | February 1977 | Pages 186-204
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31723
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactivity perturbation method has been investigated as a possible technique for the assay of spent fuel rods from a 233UO2-ThO2-fueled core. A hard interrogating spectrum was provided at the center of the ARMF-1 core by two B4C filters of different thickness. Rods up to 267 cm (2.67 m) long were pulled through the core at speeds up to 25 cm/min (4.17 × 10−2 m/s), and the time-integrated reactivity worth was measured. The fuel response of both filters was found to be linear over a wide fuel density range, with good fuel sensitivity. Fission product sensitivities for the two filters, obtained both experimentally and calculationally, were very low and in good agreement with one another. Single-measurement uncertainty was 0.6 g at the 25 cm/min (4.17 × 10−3 m/s) pulling speed. Total estimated assay precision, including both systematic and random errors, for a hypothetical assay of 500 rods was ∼0.5%.