ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Osamu Yokomizo, Hiroshi Motoda, Takashi Kiguchi, Renzo Takeda
Nuclear Technology | Volume 29 | Number 2 | May 1976 | Pages 191-199
Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31578
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A man-machine communication system has been developed for boiling water reactor (BWR) core management planning to provide a very flexible tool, which is complementary to automated optimization programs that maximize or minimize one particular performance index under certain constraints. A three-dimensional BWR simulator, which can cover a wide range of BWR operating conditions, has been developed and coupled with a graphic display serving as a main input-output controlling device. The system has been successfully applied to generate a long-term control rod programming of a BWR in which locally poisoned fuel assemblies are loaded. The time required for one cycle analysis is ∼3 h, out of which the actual computation time is only 4 min with an average of three trials of rod pattern search per exposure step. The quick response (∼5 sec) and the visualized results on the screen are very helpful in understanding the complicated characteristics of the BWR core, and it is found that this kind of tool has a very great educational effect. A similar approach is expected to be applied in other fields suck as core design and safety analysis, as well as in core management.