ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Mohamed S. El-Genk, Hamed H. Saber
Nuclear Technology | Volume 132 | Number 2 | November 2000 | Pages 290-308
Technical Paper | Decontamination/Decommissioning | doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3145
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Recent experiments have shown that radio-frequency (rf) plasma glow discharge using NF3 gas is an effective technique for the removal of uranium oxide from metal surfaces. The results of these experiments are analyzed to explain the measured dependence of the UO2 removal or etch rate on the NF3 gas pressure and the absorbed power in the plasma. The NF3 gas pressure in the experiments was varied from 10.8 to 40 Pa, and the deposited power in the plasma was varied from 25 to 210 W. The UO2 etch rate was strongly dependent on the absorbed power and, to a lesser extent, on the NF3 pressure and decreased exponentially with immersion time. At 210 W and 17 Pa, all detectable UO2 in the samples (~10.6 mg each) was removed at the endpoint, whereas the initial etch rate was ~3.11 m/min. When the absorbed power was 50 W, however, the etch rate was initially ~0.5 g/min and almost zero at the endpoint, with UO2 only partially etched. This self-limiting etching of UO2 at low power is attributed to the formation of nonvolatile intermediates UF2, UF3, UF4, UF5, UO2F, and UO2F2 on the surface. Analysis indicated that the accumulation of UF6 and, to a lesser extent, O2 near the surface partially contributed to the exponential decrease in the UO2 etch rate with immersion time. Unlike fluorination with F2 gas, etching of UO2 using rf glow discharge is possible below 663 K. The average etch rates of the amorphous UO2 in the NF3 experiments are comparable to the peak values reported in other studies for crystalline UO2 using CF4/O2 glow discharge performed at ~150 to 250 K higher sample temperatures.