ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
E. E. Bende
Nuclear Technology | Volume 131 | Number 3 | September 2000 | Pages 279-296
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3117
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This work presents the temperature reactivity effects occurring in pebbles of a high-temperature reactor fueled with reactor-grade plutonium, without any additional resonance absorbers. Burnup calculations are performed for pebbles loaded with various amounts of plutonium per pebble. During burnup, branching calculations are carried out to calculate k as a function of the uniform temperature. For a high plutonium mass per pebble and low burnup values, k decreases with uniform temperature, which indicates a negative uniform temperature coefficient of reactivity (UTC). However, for a low plutonium mass per pebble, as well as for a high plutonium mass per pebble in combination with high burnup, k is maximal at a particular uniform temperature. Below this temperature, the UTC is positive, while above this temperature it is negative. Branching calculations with only a varying moderator temperature show almost the same behavior, which indicates that the contribution of the fuel temperature plays a minor role for the mentioned effect. To understand the reactivity effect, the moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) is investigated by two methods. In the first method, changes in reaction rates of individual nuclides and their corresponding contributions to the MTC are calculated, whereas in the second method the four-factor formula has been used. For the fresh fuel cases, the positive coefficient at low temperature is due to a positive coefficient for the thermal utilization factor. For high moderator temperatures, the coefficient for the resonance escape probability renders the MTC negative. This trend is basically caused by the shift of the high-energy tail of the Maxwell-spectrum toward the 1-eV resonance of 240Pu, and toward the resonances of 241Pu, which leads to an increase of the capture-to-fission ratio.