ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
R. L. Currie, P. B. Parks, J. L. Jarriel
Nuclear Technology | Volume 12 | Number 4 | December 1971 | Pages 356-362
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A30984
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Subcritical multiplication constants have been derived from static and pulsed measurements for arrays of large, hollow cylinders of uranium-aluminum alloy. The cylinders were of two types: 11.21-cm-i.d., 20.07-cm-o.d. bare 235U-Al alloy castings and 10.07-cm-i.d., 12.27-cm-o.d. Alclad “logs” extruded from the castings. The alloy was 9.985 wt% enriched uranium (92.2% 235U) in aluminum. These measurements extended previous benchmark experiments with small diameter rods of lower enrichment into the region of larger diameters and higher enrichments. The transport diffusion theory codes MGBS-TGAN overestimated the values of keff for the arrays tested by 7 to 12%. The more sophisticated Monte Carlo code KENO was more accurate, with errors less than 5%.