ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
William D. Rhodes, Raymond V. Furstenau, Howard A. Larson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 130 | Number 2 | May 2000 | Pages 145-158
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3083
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The generic technique of applying pseudorandom, discrete-level, periodic reactivity perturbation signals to measure the reactivity-to-power frequency response function was extended to the liquid-metal reactor, Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II). This technique was developed in the late 1960s and applied in several reactor designs with extensive testing performed at the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment. Signals employed at EBR-II included the pseudorandom binary sequence, quadratic residue binary sequence, pseudorandom ternary sequence, and multifrequency binary sequence. For all the signals employed, the resultant reactor power perturbation was small enough to be acceptable for normal at-power operation and in-place irradiation experiments. The frequency response results are compared with the zero-power frequency response function, yielding a quantitative measure of the EBR-II reactivity feedback effects. The frequency response function results are in good agreement with rod-oscillator data and model predictions. The multifrequency binary sequence concentrated 64% of the total signal power into the four feedback frequencies associated with the predominant feedback time constants. The input signal quality, characterized by the autocorrelation function and power spectra, validated the automatic control rod drive system design and operation as an effective tool for frequency response determination over the range of frequencies where important system dynamic effects occur.