ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Yassin A. Hassan, Dionisie R. Moscalu
Nuclear Technology | Volume 129 | Number 1 | January 2000 | Pages 82-92
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3047
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A RELAP5/MOD3.2 model of a VVER-1000 (V-320 model) nuclear power plant was updated, improved, and validated against actual power plant data. The data included steady-state and operational transient results from unit 5 of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant in Bulgaria. The first operational transient was initiated by a loss of flow at partial power conditions caused by the trip of a main coolant pump without reactor scram. The second operational transient was a continuation of the first, with the trip of a second main coolant pump.The assessment of the model has been performed in two stages: an initial validation against steady-state plant data and then a transient validation by comparison to operational transient data. The comparison between the plant data and the results of the calculations proved the adequacy of the model and demonstrated the capability of the code to reproduce the evolution of the main plant parameters.