ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Jean-Paul Deffain, Philippe Alexandre, Paul Thomet
Nuclear Technology | Volume 127 | Number 3 | September 1999 | Pages 267-286
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A3001
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This feasibility study on core control using only the control rods is conducted with the TOPAZE algorithm - implemented in the CRONOS2 core calculation code - in its two versions: version 1 (minimization of the two-dimensional peak, imposed axial offset) and version 2 (minimization extended to three-dimensional, without imposed axial offset). The sensitivity analysis on the power peaks was carried out on the variations of the axial height of the burnable poisons and the type of grey or black control rod clusters. It is demonstrated that the reduction in the number of rod cluster controls allows a correct smoothing of the reactivity over the whole cycle, except for the end of cycle when control rods are moved upward.For load follow feasibility studies, several approaches, based on simulations performed with MISRITME have been evaluated: variation of the primary flow rate for axial offset control; use of a program, with temperature decreasing with the power; and finally, coupling of a temperature range, centered on a reference temperature with a negative gradient, to the French N4 reactor control mode Dispositif de Manoeuvrabilité Accrue: X (DMAX). It is shown that the return to equilibrium following a low threshold of 40% induces an additional penalty between 15 and 20% on the power peak. Solutions are suggested to globally reduce these peaks, which appear during all operating conditions.Two types of reactivity-induced accidents linked to clusters are studied: the removal of a rod cluster control assembly (RCCA) at full power (class III) and the ejection of a RCCA (class IV). It is also shown that ejection at zero power, with a released reactivity of 1.86 $, does not cause major damage to cladding and fuel. However, at full power, with the assumptions made, a partial melting of the pellet occurs without however creating fuel dispersion in the coolant.