ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Lothar Wolf, Ashok Rastogi, Dag Wennerberg, Thomas Cron, Edgar Hansjosten
Nuclear Technology | Volume 125 | Number 2 | February 1999 | Pages 136-154
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2938
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The contribution by the Heiss Dampf Reaktor Safety Program, phase III, to the German containment hydrogen research activities were twofold:1. to confirm the findings of the experiments in the Battelle Model Containment (BMC) in volumes of typically ~100 m3 by similar ones at a larger scale with a total volume of 500 m32. to broaden the database for assessing the emerging modeling strategy for larger scales toward more realistic subcompartment sizes.To supplement the results obtained in the BMC in a proper, controlled manner for additional model development and computer code verification, a total of seven experiments was performed, and the following positions for hydrogen ignition were examined:test group E12.1: hydrogen deflagration in a vertically oriented subcompartmenttest group E12.2: ignition close to the venttest group E12.3: accelerated jet ignition in a horizontal direction.The maximum peak pressure occurred for E12.3.3 at 1.8 bars under typical accelerated jet ignition conditions for 12 vol% initial H2 concentration. Because of larger vent openings, maximum peak pressures were generally lower than observed in BMC tests, whereas maximum temperatures were substantially higher, reaching 1000°C and above. A few comparisons between data and code results from CONTAIN, RALOC-HYDCOM, and CONTAIN/BASSIM computations are shown, indicating the need for further improvements.