ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Martin J. R. Pierre, Hugues W. Bonin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 125 | Number 1 | January 1999 | Pages 1-12
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2928
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The availability of the Monte Carlo-based code MCNP 4A has made possible the simulation of the low-enriched uranium (LEU)-fueled SLOWPOKE-2 reactor using a probabilistic approach. The reactor core and its surrounding pool can be modeled in three dimensions with numerous details included in the representation. Significant improvement from previous modeling attempts was obtained with the MCNP 4A simulation, with the discrepancy between the calculated and experimental values of the excess reactivity at 20°C reduced to only 0.2 mk. The analysis suggests the error of the MCNP 4A-calculated excess reactivity as between 1 and 2 mk.The SLOWPOKE-2 reactor was then simulated with its single control rod at various degrees of insertion in the core: The reactivity worth of the rod was calculated as 7.85 mk, only 2.4 mk above the measured value. MCNP was then used for predicting the temperature effects on the excess reactivity. Although the inherent safety of the SLOWPOKE-2 reactor was confirmed in the simulation, the temperature dependence of the excess reactivity could not however be accurately predicted, due for the most part to the lack of appropriate cross-section libraries available at the time of this work. The potential of MCNP 4A is nevertheless clearly demonstrated for the simulation of the LEU-fueled SLOWPOKE-2 reactor, once the missing cross sections become available for the low temperatures at which the reactor operates.