ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Patrick G. Boyle, Daniel E. Hughes, Samuel H. Levine
Nuclear Technology | Volume 123 | Number 2 | August 1998 | Pages 222-230
Technical Note | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2894
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Pennsylvania State University Breazeale (TRIGA) Reactor (PSBR) has operated for 25 yr (440 MWd) using a mixed 12 wt% ZrHx-U and 8.5 wt% ZrHx-U fuel configuration (both enriched to 20 wt% 235U, and x, the ratio of H to Zr, is nominally 1.65). In this configuration, the most reactive 12 wt% ZrHx-U fuel is always in the B-ring. The B-ring is the innermost hexagonal ring, incorporating 6 fuel elements, and the C-ring is the next outward ring, having 12 fuel elements. PSBR experience during pulsing and steady-state operation indicates that with these configurations the maximum fuel temperatures should be reduced in order to extend the useful life of the 12 wt% ZrHx-U fuel. This is because during the past 10 yr, the fuel temperatures of the new fuel have been significantly higher than the original fuel. The instrumented fuel element (I-15) loaded into the core ~10 yr ago and the most recent batch of fresh 12 wt% ZrHx-U fuel elements (six total, including I-16 and I-17) measured temperatures more than 100°C higher than any previous instrumented fuel element. Subsequent pulsing of I-15 increased its measured fuel temperature to where it began to approach the limiting safety system setting. Recent pulsing of I-16 and I-17 caused their steady-state fuel temperatures to decrease slightly, but they remain high. The new fuel management plan reduces these fuel temperatures by replacing the used 12 wt% ZrHx-U fuel in the C-ring with fresh 12 wt% ZrHx-U fuel. The 12 wt% ZrHx-U fuel in the B-ring is replaced with 8.5 wt% ZrHx-U fuel. Experiments have been performed to verify the predicted core parameters for the new plan. The lifetime of the new 12 wt% ZrHx-U fuel should now be limited by its maximum allowed burnup, which has not occurred so far.