ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Atul A. Karve, Chae Han, Rizwan-uddin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 123 | Number 2 | August 1998 | Pages 121-129
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2886
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Axial power shapes that develop during power-maneuvering simulations in pressurized water reactors must be analyzed to ensure that an adequate margin to avoid departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) is maintained during these transients. To reduce the number of flux shapes that need to be analyzed in detail to determine the DNB ratio (DNBR), often generic axial flux shapes are analyzed and maximum-allowable-peaking (MAP) limits are determined to conservatively filter those actual axial power shapes that are clearly safe. Current generic MAP limits, obtained for axial flux shapes generated by a two-parameter-based axial flux shape generator, are overly conservative for some power shapes and are nonconservative for others, leading to unnecessary operational restrictions on conservative cases. A penalty is imposed on nonconservative cases. To reduce the number of overly conservative and nonconservative cases, a new generic axial power shape generator that is based on three parameters is developed. Generic MAP limits have been developed for the new axial flux shape generator and tested using real flux shapes by plotting the percent deviation of MAP limits for generic flux shapes from the corresponding value for actual flux shapes. A new axial flux shape generator, which is clearly superior because it leads to a significantly lower percent deviation, will lead to reduced man-hours for detailed DNBR analyses and remove some of the unnecessary operational restrictions imposed by the old flux shape generator.