ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Young Min Kwon, Chan Eok Park, Jin Ho Song
Nuclear Technology | Volume 122 | Number 3 | June 1998 | Pages 295-305
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2871
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To investigate the realistic behavior of mass and energy release and resultant containment response during a large-break loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), analyses are performed on the Yonggwang (YGN) 3&4 nuclear power plants using the RELAP5/CONTEMPT4 computer code. Comparative analyses using conservative design computer codes are also performed. The break types analyzed are the double-ended guillotine breaks at the cold leg and hot leg. The design analysis predicts that the containment peak pressure occurs during the postblowdown phase for the cold-leg break. However, RELAP5/CONTEMPT4 analyses show that the containment pressure has a peak during the blowdown phase, thereafter it decreases monotonously without the postblowdown peak. For the hot-leg break, revised design analysis shows a much lower pressure than that reported in the YGN 3&4 final safety analysis report. The RELAP5/CONTEMPT4 analysis shows a similar trend and confirms that the bypass flow through the broken loop steam generator during postblowdown is negligibly small compared to that of the cold-leg break. In conclusion, realistic analysis by RELAP5/CONTEMPT4 demonstrates that the containment peak pressure occurs during the blowdown phase for both cold- and hot-leg large-break LOCAs, and there is no physical mechanism resulting in mass and energy discharge that can pressurize the containment after end of blowdown for a hot-leg break. Also, it is suggested that the substantial conservatism included in the design analysis should be improved to provide benefits in relaxing the plant technical specifications and reducing the containment design pressure.