ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Michael Langer, Manfred Wallner
Nuclear Technology | Volume 121 | Number 2 | February 1998 | Pages 199-211
Technical Paper | German Direct Disposal Project | doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2832
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Site-specific data of the Gorleben salt dome (e.g., the geological structure of the salt dome and the geomechanical properties of the evaporite) are presented in the form of a working model to optimize the various repository concepts discussed within the German research project "Direct Disposal of Spent Fuel" and to compare their long-term effects.A comparative evaluation of the different emplacement concepts was made on the basis of the following calculated results, which are considered decisive: temperatures in the repository, temperatures in the salt dome/overburden transition zone, tensile stresses at the top of the salt dome zone, and uplift at the ground surface.The thermal and thermomechanical consequences of four preselected emplacement concepts do not differ very much. The rock mechanical analyses of the far field do not indicate any particular concept as being clearly preferable.The following results of the parameter variations (creep capacity and width of the repository field) are significant. A reduction in the repository field width gives lower maximum temperatures for the same specific heat load. An evaporite formation with a high creep capacity leads to significantly lower stress reduction at the top of the salt dome; tensile stresses do not occur. The stress reductions at the top of the salt dome are also less, but the horizontal stress orthogonal to the repository still lies in the tensile zone, if a low creep capacity of the rock salt is assumed.