ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Michael Langer, Manfred Wallner
Nuclear Technology | Volume 121 | Number 2 | February 1998 | Pages 199-211
Technical Paper | German Direct Disposal Project | doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2832
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Site-specific data of the Gorleben salt dome (e.g., the geological structure of the salt dome and the geomechanical properties of the evaporite) are presented in the form of a working model to optimize the various repository concepts discussed within the German research project "Direct Disposal of Spent Fuel" and to compare their long-term effects.A comparative evaluation of the different emplacement concepts was made on the basis of the following calculated results, which are considered decisive: temperatures in the repository, temperatures in the salt dome/overburden transition zone, tensile stresses at the top of the salt dome zone, and uplift at the ground surface.The thermal and thermomechanical consequences of four preselected emplacement concepts do not differ very much. The rock mechanical analyses of the far field do not indicate any particular concept as being clearly preferable.The following results of the parameter variations (creep capacity and width of the repository field) are significant. A reduction in the repository field width gives lower maximum temperatures for the same specific heat load. An evaporite formation with a high creep capacity leads to significantly lower stress reduction at the top of the salt dome; tensile stresses do not occur. The stress reductions at the top of the salt dome are also less, but the horizontal stress orthogonal to the repository still lies in the tensile zone, if a low creep capacity of the rock salt is assumed.