ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Earl F. Gee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 2 | October 1989 | Pages 527-530
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Health Physics and Environmental Release / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27748
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
At the time of the accident at Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) in March 1979, the station was ill-prepared for the respiratory protection demands that arose. Although a recognized respiratory protection program that permitted the application of protection factors for planned maintenance under controlled conditions was in place, it lacked the depth and detail needed to handle the immediate accident and subsequent recovery. Major problems realized immediately following the accident included an inadequate supply of emergency equipment and compressed air charging capacity, too few qualified personnel, and access to plant training and fit-test facilities. For the long-term cleanup, a complete revision of the scope and depth of the respiratory program was necessary. A full-time respiratory protection supervisor was assigned to oversee the program, which was expanded to include the following: