ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Dennis E. Ferguson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 2 | October 1989 | Pages 443-449
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Health Physics and Environmental Release / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27735
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The robotic characterization program at Three Mile Island Unit 2 evolved in response to requirements and problems revealed during earlier work. From October 31 to November 9, 1987, an extensive survey of the 86.1-m (282-ft, 6-in.) elevation of the reactor building (RB) was conducted using the Rover robot and the Diver directional survey system. Personnel obtained 243 contact and general area exposure rates using directional survey instrumentation. From August 19 to August 24, 1988, another survey of the 86.1-m (282-ft, 6-in.) elevation of the RB was conducted. The results of this survey suggest that there was a reduction of the basement source term as the result of decontamination work, but insufficient data had been obtained to properly quantify the effects of the various decontamination efforts. The results of the surveys, and the lessons learned about equipment and survey technique during the robotic characterization program, are reported to enhance understanding of the basement status and to assist in future planning for robotic surveying systems.