ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Clay M. Davis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 4 | December 1989 | Pages 778-785
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Decontamination and Waste Management / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27671
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The March 28, 1979, loss-of-coolant accident at Three Mile Island Unit 2 resulted in the exposure of ∼3000 m2 of reactor building (RB) internal concrete surfaces to both liquid- and vapor-borne contaminants. The period of contact between these surfaces and aqueous solutions of mixed fission products ranged from a few days to several years. At the completion of gross decontamination of the accessible elevations of the RB in 1982 by water flushing, high-pressure spraying, strippable coating application, and hands-on wiping, dose rates remained above expected levels. Surveys and limited surface sampling indicated that contaminants had penetrated the protective coatings on the structural concrete, creating a substantial fixed source. To assess the depth of contaminant penetration into the concrete, a sampling program was conducted in September 1983. Based on the results of this program, it was determined that where coatings were intact, penetration past the matrix of the coating was insignificant. Where the coatings had been damaged prior to the accident, however, penetrations into the concrete were observed up to 20 mm. Subsequent modeling using the ISOSHLD II code using these values indicated that between 23 and 40% of the 1983 observed dose rates could be attributed to this source. Coatings removal tests conducted on the samples demonstrated that removal of the coatings could result in the removal of between 50 and 98% of the activity. Subsequent to this work, coatings and concrete removal on the accessible upper elevations of the RB resulted in dose reductions of 15 to 38%. These data, and that of subsequent work in the RB basement, indicate that protective coatings applied to structural concrete substantially reduce the degree to which the substrate will be penetrated by aqueous contaminant solutions. Relative to the ability to successfully remove absorbed contamination, the coating matrix containing the major fraction of the radionuclide load may be removed with less aggressive effort than that required to remove a potentially larger volume of contaminated concrete.