ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Paul David Bottomley, Michel Coquerelle
Nuclear Technology | Volume 87 | Number 1 | August 1989 | Pages 120-136
Technical Paper | TMI-2: Materials Behavior / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A27642
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Samples of the bores obtained from the melted core of the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) reactor were investigated as part of the TMI-2 accident evaluation program. The samples included fuel rod segments, control rod cladding, melted core rocks, and powder debris from various bores into the reactor core. The microstructure of the specimens was determined by examination and analysis of surface and cross section by means of electro-optical techniques (including energy-dispersive X-ray scanning electron microscopy and microprobe analysis). Gamma spectroscopy and a fission product release study were also performed on the specimens. The melted core rock specimens obtained from the G12 bores were mostly porous ceramic mixtures of uranium and zirconium oxides in the form of a fine eutectic of UO2- and ZrO2-rich phases and oxidized ferrous material derived from the stainless steel components. The rock specimens showed variations in porosity and ferrous content but a similar UO2-ZrO2 eutectic structure. Fission product analysis of the fuel segments and rocks indicated relatively low levels of activity due to fission products such as I37Cs, 106Ru, I54Eu, and fuel irradiation products. No volatile 129I was detected, but most other products displayed some retention in the melted core samples. According to whether eutectics were formed between Zr(O) and UO2 or ZrO2 and UO2 (i.e., the oxygen potential in the core), reference to the phase diagrams suggests temperatures of 2173 to 2873 K (1900 to 2600°C) for substantial periods and even up to 3073 K (2800°C) (U02 melting point) for the completely melted core specimens. Agglomerate specimens indicate lower temperatures [∼1673 K (1400°C), the melting point of stainless steel] and shorter excursion times at the edge of the melt zone. The remaining fuel rod segments showed very little change, indicating that the severe overheating is localized to the central part of the reactor pile.