ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
MARVEL team shares lessons learned through microreactor development
On June 1 at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., a team from Idaho National Laboratory presented a session titled “Lessons Learned from MARVEL Reactor Fabrication.” The presentation highlighted challenges that arose as they moved from design to manufacturing and assembly, with a focus on reactor part fabrication, Stirling engine implementation, and reactivity control system development.
Jiro Wakabayashi, Shin-Ichi Tashima, Akio Gofuku
Nuclear Technology | Volume 70 | Number 3 | September 1985 | Pages 343-353
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A15961
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two kinds of identification techniques for the diagnosis of disturbances in nuclear power plants have been proposed, and the applicability of these techniques to actual plants has been verified by computer experiments. In both techniques, a set of the observed signals (observed vector) obtained from an actual plant is identified with one of the categories representing a normal state, several anticipated anomalous situations, and an unanticipated anomalous state, in which the categories corresponding to the anticipated anomalous situations are classified by the kind and approximate magnitude of the anomaly source (the disturbance). The maximum likelihood technique is used in method 1. It applies to the identification of multiple anticipated disturbances that happen sequentially with some time interval, even if a plant has some nonlinear characteristics. The projective operator technique is used in method 2. It applies to the identification of any kind of multiple anticipated disturbances under the conditions of the plant having approximately linear characteristics and the observed vectors corresponding to the anticipated disturbances are linearly independent of each other.