ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
WIPP: Lessons in transportation safety
As part of a future consent-based approach by the federal government to site new deep geologic repositories for nuclear waste, local communities and states that are considering hosting such facilities are sure to have many questions. Currently, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico is the only example of such a repository in operation, and it offers the opportunity for state and local officials to visit and judge for themselves the risks and benefits of hosting a similar facility. But its history can also provide lessons for these officials, particularly the political process leading up to the opening of WIPP, the safety of WIPP operations and transportation of waste from generator facilities to the site, and the economic impacts the project has had on the local area of Carlsbad, as well as the rest of the state of New Mexico.
J. P. Lestone, C. R. Bates, M. B. Chadwick, M. W. Paris
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 80 | Number 1 | October 2024 | Pages S72-S88
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2024.2334973
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
While studying d(d,n)3He fusion in 1938, Ruhlig observed protons with energies larger than 15 MeV. Ruhlig suggested that these high-energy protons were generated by tritium-on-deuterium fusion neutrons scattering protons out of a thin cellophane foil placed inside a cloud chamber. This led Ruhlig to hypothesize that he was observing secondary (in-flight) tritium-on-deuterium fusions and conclude that the d(t,n) reaction “must be an exceedingly probable one.” This was the first attempt to quantify the probability of d(t,n) fusion, using the ~1-MeV tritons generated by d(d,p)t fusion. This caused some Manhattan Project scientists to suggest that the d(t,n) cross sections are significantly higher than those for deuteron-on-deuterium fusion and led to the first measurement of d(3He,p) and d(t,n) cross sections in 1943. Here, we have used modern cross sections and stopping powers to estimate the expected numbers of high-energy protons associated with in-flight d(t,n) reactions in Ruhlig’s experiment. Our estimate is four orders of magnitude lower than Ruhlig’s observed rate. However, the number of high-energy protons in Ruhlig’s experiment can be obtained via simulation if the protons are assumed to have been emitted by secondary in-flight d(3He,p) reactions, with various plausible assumptions about the experimental geometry and target-backing thickness. Our calculations demonstrate that quantitative information about the fusion of A = 3 ions with deuterium could have been obtained via experiments similar to Ruhlig’s well in advance of the advent of 3He ion and triton beams in 1943. This opportunity seems to have been missed.