ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Y. E. Kim, M. Rabinowitz, Y. K. Bae, G. S. Chulick, R. A. Rice
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 20 | Number 4 | December 1991 | Pages 797-807
Inertial Confinement Fusion | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A11946939
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In recent experiments, cluster beams of ≳ 100 keV (D2O)+n impacting on deuterated targets produced much higher than expected D – D fusion rates. We present a novel hot plasma shock-wave model for cluster–impact fusion that is capable of explaining and reproducing the known experimental data. We demonstrate that clusters are capable of inducing shock waves, and that concomitant energy losses are negligible in the present experiments. From our model, we present predictions for D – D and D – T fusion rates for a variety of different targets which may give even higher yields in future experiments. Furthermore, we show theoretically that it is highly unlikely that cluster–impact fusion data can be explained on the basis of artifacts such as light ionic contaminants. Finally, we show that the observed line broadening of the proton spectrum is consistent with our prediction of a high temperature in the impact region.