ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
M. Murakamia, V. Arunasalam, J.D. Bella, M.G. Bell, M. Bitter, W.R. Blanchard, F. Boody, D. Boydb, N. Bretz, C.E. Busha, J.D. Callenc, J.L. Cecchi, R.J. Colchina, J. Coonrod, S.L. Davis, D. Dimock, H.F. Dylla, P.C. Efthimion, L.C. Emersona, A.C. Englanda, H.P. Eubank, R. Fonck, E. Fredrickson, H.P. Furth, L.R. Grisham, S. von Goeler, R.J. Goldston, B. Grek, D.J. Grove, R.J. Hawryluk, H. Hendeld, K.W. Hill, R. Hulse, D. Johnson, L.C. Johnson, R. Kaita, J. Kamperschroer, S.M. Kaye, M. Kikuchie, S. Kilpatrick, H. Kugel, P.H. LaMarche, R. Little, C.H. Maa, D. Manos, D. Mansfield, M. McCarthy, R.T. McCann, D.C. McCune, K. McGuire, D.M. Meade, S.S. Medley, D.R. Mikkelsen, D. Mueller, E. Nieschmidtf, D.K. Owens, V.K. Parea, H. Park, B. Prichard, A. Ramsey, D.A. Rasmussena, A.L. Roquemore, P.H. Rutherford, N.R. Sauthoff, J. Schivell, J-L. Schwobg, S.D. Scott, S. Sesnic, M. Shimadae, J.E. Simpkinsa, J. Sinnis, F. Staufferb, B. Stratton, S. Suckewer, G.D. Tait, G. Taylor, F. Tenney, C.E. Thomasa, H.H. Towner, M. Ulrickson, R. Wieland, M. Williams, K-L. Wong, A. Wouters, H. Yamadah, S. Yoshikawa, K.M. Young, M.C Zarnstorff
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 1 | July 1985 | Pages 657-663
Plasma Engineering | Proceedings of the Sixth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (San Francisco, California, March 3-7, 1985) | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A40115
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The paper describes the present (end of February 1985) status of the plasma confinement studies in the TFTR tokamak with emphasis on those with neutral beam injection (NBI). Recent improvements in the device capabilities have substantially extended operating parameters: BT increased to 4.0 T, Ip to 2.0 MA, injection power (Pb) to 5 MW with H° or D° beams, to 5 × 1019 m−3 and Zeff reduced to 1.4. With ohmic heating (OH) alone, the previously established scaling for gross energy confinement time (τE ∝ ) has been confirmed at higher Ip and BT, and the maximum τE of 0.4 sec has been achieved. With NBI at Pb, substantially (by factor > 2) higher than POH, excellent power and particle accountability have been established. This suggests that the less-than-expected increase in stored energy with NBI is not due to problems of power delivery, but due to problems of confinement deterioration. τE is observed to scale approximately as Ip Pb−0.5 (independent of ), consistent with previous L-mode scalings. With NBI we have achieved the maximum τE of 0.2 s and the maximum Ti (o) of 4.4 keV in the normal operating regime, and even higher Ti(o) in the energetic-ion regime with low-ne and low Ip operation.
