ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
M.Z. Youssef, Y. Watanabe, M. Abdou, M. Nakagawa, T. Mori, K. Kosako, T. Nakamura
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 15 | Number 2 | March 1989 | Pages 1299-1308
Blanket Nucleonics Experiment | doi.org/10.13182/FST89-A39869
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several fusion-oriented integral experiments were performed in Phase II of the U.S./JAERI Collaborative Program on Fusion Neutronics where the geometrical configurations and source condition closely simulate the incident spectrum in fusion reactors. The main objective of the program is to estimate the uncertainties involved in predicting tritium breeding rate in Li2O and other neutronics parameters in fusion blankets that include engineering features (i.e., first wall, multiplier). In Phase II, the Li2O test assembly is placed on one end of a Li2CO3 enclosure that houses the D-T neutron source. Predicted local and integrated tritium production rates (TPR) from 6Li(T6), 7Li(T7) and natural lithium (TN) were compared to measurements in various configurations that included reference, first wall and beryllium multiplier experiments (Phase IIA) in addition to repeating these experiments with a FW/Be layer covering the interior surface of the Li2CO3 enclosure (Phase IIB). Other neutronics parameters that included source characterization by foil measurements, in-system reaction rates, and in-system spectrum measurements were also analyzed. The analyses were carried out independently by both parties using various 3-D Monte Carlo codes and 2-D discrete ordinates codes and data libraries. The results of the analyses are reported in this paper with emphasis placed on the impact of the beryllium data on the discrepancies found between predictions and measurements.