ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
Manfred Wanner, Konrad Risse, and Thomas Rummel
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 65 | Number 3 | May 2014 | Pages 391-398
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST13-712
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The superconducting coils of the Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X) stellarator use a cable-in-conduit conductor that is wound as double layers. These double layers are connected by low-ohmic joints to limit ohmic heating. All joints were equipped with voltage taps to allow identification of the double layer causing a quench. During the current tests of the superconducting coils, the differences between adjacent voltage taps were measured, and the joint resistances between the double layers were estimated. The cryogenic tests of the 50 nonplanar and 20 planar coils provided a unique opportunity to analyze the variation of the resistance of 250 joints of the nonplanar coils and of 40 joints of the planar coils. The statistical analysis shows that the resistance of most of the joints was well below the specified value of 1 nΩ.