ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
Laila A. El-Guebaly
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 2128-2132
Blanket Shield and Neutronic | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A30035
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ARIES study investigates the potential of tokamaks as fusion power reactors and focuses on improving the economic and safety features of fusion by integrating the environmental constraints into the design from the beginning. The ARIES-II and ARIES-IV designs incorporate advanced physics and technologies that would be available over the next 5–20 years. The two designs have the same plasma physics but different fusion-power-core designs.1 ARIES-II uses liquid Li as a coolant/breeder with V alloy structure while ARIES-IV employs solid breeder with He coolant and SiC/SiC composite structure. Low activation materials were utilized in the design to reduce the radioactive inventory. A variety of blanket/shield options was examined for both designs and the relative merits of the various materials as a function of blanket/shield thickness were demonstrated. The lifetime of the structural components was determined based on the radiation-induced damage in V and SiC. In this paper, a comparison between the two designs based on detailed neutronics analysis is presented.