ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Laila A. El-Guebaly
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 2128-2132
Blanket Shield and Neutronic | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A30035
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ARIES study investigates the potential of tokamaks as fusion power reactors and focuses on improving the economic and safety features of fusion by integrating the environmental constraints into the design from the beginning. The ARIES-II and ARIES-IV designs incorporate advanced physics and technologies that would be available over the next 5–20 years. The two designs have the same plasma physics but different fusion-power-core designs.1 ARIES-II uses liquid Li as a coolant/breeder with V alloy structure while ARIES-IV employs solid breeder with He coolant and SiC/SiC composite structure. Low activation materials were utilized in the design to reduce the radioactive inventory. A variety of blanket/shield options was examined for both designs and the relative merits of the various materials as a function of blanket/shield thickness were demonstrated. The lifetime of the structural components was determined based on the radiation-induced damage in V and SiC. In this paper, a comparison between the two designs based on detailed neutronics analysis is presented.