ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
K.M. Nikbin, G. A. Webster, N. Mitchell
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 1905-1908
Magnetic | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29997
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A single rectangular conductor jacket, including the surrounding insulation, has been modelled using finite element computational techniques. Such jackets are typical of the situation in a force flow cooled superconducting coil, where the jacket encloses the current carrying cable and the liquid helium coolant. Elliptical shaped cracks in the jacket have been included in the model to evaluate the stress intensity factors at the crack tip for three crack sizes at three different locations. Results using 3D finite elements are presented for a typical semi-elliptical surface crack in a single conductor jacket under tensile loading. It has been found that mesh and element sizes contribute to the variation in the values of the stress intensity factors calculated but that the relative accuracy of the results is generally within ±5%.