ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
T. Kunugi, M. Akiba, M. Ogawa, H. Ise, S. Yamazaki
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 1863-1867
Plasma-Facing Component | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29990
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several numerical codes were developed and used to evaluate the erosion thickness of the plasma facing wall. Some discrepancies of the results using the existing codes are pointed out. It is very important to understand the reason of the discrepancies. The analytical studies were performed to find the sensitivity of some factors on the results, such as boundary conditions, evaporation models and thermal properties. It was found that the temperature dependency effects of thermal conductivity and vapor pressure strongly affected the erosion results. Unfortunately, the results of this study cannot sufficiently explain the discrepancies. We would like to emphasize the necessity of the verification of the existing codes and numerical models, and the physical understanding.