ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
John C. Wesley, the U. S. ITER Home Teama
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 1380-1388
International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29916
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Design features and performance parameters for HARD — the high-aspect-ratio (A = 4) International Thermonuclear Engineering Reactor (ITER) design variant developed by the U. S. ITER Team — are presented. The HARD design makes it possible for ITER to achieve both the ignition/extended-burn and the steady-state/technology-testing performance goals set forth in the ITER Terms of Reference. These performance capabilities are obtained in a device that is otherwise similar in concept, size and cost to the low-aspect-ratio (A = 2.8) ITER design defined during the ITER Conceptual Design Activity (CDA). HARD is based on the same physics and engineering guidelines as the CDA design and achieves the same ignition performance (ignition margin evaluated against ITER-89P confinement scaling) with inductively-driven plasmas as ITER CDA, but with much greater margin for inductive sustainment of the pulse duration. With non-inductive current drive, HARD operates at lower plasma current and higher plasma density and bootstrap current fraction than ITER CDA, is less constrained by beta limit and divertor considerations, and has increased peaking of the neutron wall load at the test module location. These factors give HARD a much better potential than ITER CDA to achieve the steady-state operation and 1 MWa/m2 technology-testing fluence goals of the ITER objectives.