ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE-EM issues draft RFP for Hanford lab work, awards WIPP monitoring grant
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management issued a draft request for proposals on June 25 for the Hanford Site’s 222-S Laboratory contract. The 222-S Laboratory is the primary on-site laboratory for analysis of highly radioactive samples in support of all projects at the DOE’s Hanford Site in Washington state.
Yuan Chen, Gang Chen, Rong Liu, Haiping Guo, Wenjiang Chen, Wenmian Jiang, Jian Shen
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 1919-1924
Neutronic | Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Oak Brook, Illinois, October 7-11, 1990) | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29622
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Using the Total Absorption Method, the neutron multiplications in beryllium have been measured. A deionized water sphere with outer radius of 75 cm and a polyethylene sphere with outer radius of 69 cm were used as the total neutron absorbers. Neutron distributions in the spheres were measured using 235U fission chambers. The relative and the efficiency-determined methods were compared. Important sources of experimental errors were detailly analyzed. 4 groups of neutron multiplications in beryllium up to 14.85 cm thick for two total absorbers and two methods of measurement have been obtained and agreement among them is satisfactory. Measured results have been compared with ANISN calculations using data from ENDF/B-IV. It is shown that the differences between calculations and experiments are up to 15%.