ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
J. D. Galambos, Y-K. M. Peng, L. J. Perkins
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 1463-1468
ITER | Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Oak Brook, Illinois, October 7-11, 1990) | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29547
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The nominal International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) configuration is a double-null (DN) divertor, which requires precise plasma vertical position control. Vertical displacements of only about 1 cm (out of a plasma height of 4.7 m) are estimated to destroy the up/down symmetric distribution of power flow to the divertor plates. As an alternate configuration to avoid this difficulty, we look at the single-null (SN) option, where all the charged power flow is deposited on the lower divertor plate. The primary consideration in this study is that of technology phase performance (maximum neutron wall load) for the ITER divertor heat load and plasma constraints. With regard to the divertor heat loads, the SN case has the advantages of (a) longer scrape-off field line connection lengths and (b) more vertical space, which allows a greater spreading of the heat load on the divertor plates. These advantages offset the SN case disadvantage of having fewer divertor plates, and therefore the potential for higher heat fluxes for a given core plasma condition. The attainable wall loads for the SN and DN divertors are found to be similar for steady-state and hybrid operation scenarios.