ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
R. T. Santoro, R. G. Alsmiller, Jr., J. M. Barnes
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 449-459
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29385
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutronics parameters including the source neutron spectrum, activation rates, and the tritium breeding in the Li2O test zone of the Fusion Neutron Source Phase II experiment performed at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute are calculated using the Monte Carlo code MORSE with ENDF/B-V transport and reaction cross sections. Favorable comparisons between the measured and calculated results are achieved for the 27Al(n,α), 58Ni(n,p), 93Nb(n,2n), and 197Au(n,2n) reactions. Calculated 58Ni(n,2n) and 197Au(n,γ) reactions do not agree with measured values within 10 to 40%. For the nickel reaction, the differences may be due to poor data in the ORACT files, while discrepancies for the gold data may be due to unknown quantities of hydrogen-rich epoxy used to coat the Li2CO3 blocks used in the test assembly walls. The calculated tritium breeding in the Li2O agrees with experimental values within ±10% for 6Li and ±15 to 20% for 7Li.