ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE-EM issues draft RFP for Hanford lab work, awards WIPP monitoring grant
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management issued a draft request for proposals on June 25 for the Hanford Site’s 222-S Laboratory contract. The 222-S Laboratory is the primary on-site laboratory for analysis of highly radioactive samples in support of all projects at the DOE’s Hanford Site in Washington state.
Maurizio Angelone, Paola Batistoni, Marcello Martone, Mario Pillon, Massimo Rapisarda, Sofia Rollet
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 431-439
Technical Paper | Experimental Device | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29383
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Frascati Tokamak Upgrade (FTU) neutron activation system has been calibrated using indium foils and a 252Cf spontaneous fission neutron source located at several positions within the tokamak. The same experimental arrangements have been simulated with the MCNP Monte Carlo neutron and photon transport code in order to numerically reproduce the activation response coefficients measured experimentally. The main purpose of the comparison is to assess the accuracy of the numerical simulation and of the modeling of the FTU device. This analysis has a more general relevance in view of the use of the activation system as an independent method for the absolute measurement of the neutron yield in next-step fusion devices. An overall agreement at the 22% level between experiment and calculation has been demonstrated.