ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Knoxville’s nuclear workshop opens with a full house and a long to-do list
The East Tennessee Economic Council’s Nuclear Opportunities Workshop opened yesterday morning at the Knoxville Convention Center, drawing registrants from around the country, and will close later today following a packed lineup of policy and industry leaders.
Yasushi Yamamoto, Kiyoshi Yoshikawa, Hisayuki Toku, Tsuneyuki Haga
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 17 | Number 4 | July 1990 | Pages 540-554
Technical Paper | Beam Direct Conversion | doi.org/10.13182/FST90-A29190
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments and simulations were performed for helium ion beams to confirm the general validity of the two-dimensional beam direct energy conversion simulation code KUAD (Kyoto University Advanced Dart) for a wide range of beam parameters and to better understand how the performance of beam direct energy recovery is dependent on beam parameters. The experiments compared currents in the 60- to 140-mA range for 15-keV beam energy and from 130 to 250 mA for 20-keV beam energy. Beam behaviors numerically predicted for different currents and collector potentials were verified. Numerically obtained performance characteristics of the beam direct energy recovery generally show excellent agreement with experimental results within experimental errors. The only discrepancy occurs in the vicinity of the collector potential corresponding to the maximum energy recovery due to possible deviation from the axisymmetry of electrodes and to their small misalignment with respect to the beam axis. Beam perveance rather than beam energy or current is a good parameter for the evaluation of the performance of beam direct energy recovery. Maximum energy recovery efficiencies of 87 ± 4% for 15-keV and 85 ± 4% for 20-keV beams have been achieved.