ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Yasushi Yamamoto, Kiyoshi Yoshikawa, Hisayuki Toku, Tsuneyuki Haga
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 17 | Number 4 | July 1990 | Pages 540-554
Technical Paper | Beam Direct Conversion | doi.org/10.13182/FST90-A29190
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments and simulations were performed for helium ion beams to confirm the general validity of the two-dimensional beam direct energy conversion simulation code KUAD (Kyoto University Advanced Dart) for a wide range of beam parameters and to better understand how the performance of beam direct energy recovery is dependent on beam parameters. The experiments compared currents in the 60- to 140-mA range for 15-keV beam energy and from 130 to 250 mA for 20-keV beam energy. Beam behaviors numerically predicted for different currents and collector potentials were verified. Numerically obtained performance characteristics of the beam direct energy recovery generally show excellent agreement with experimental results within experimental errors. The only discrepancy occurs in the vicinity of the collector potential corresponding to the maximum energy recovery due to possible deviation from the axisymmetry of electrodes and to their small misalignment with respect to the beam axis. Beam perveance rather than beam energy or current is a good parameter for the evaluation of the performance of beam direct energy recovery. Maximum energy recovery efficiencies of 87 ± 4% for 15-keV and 85 ± 4% for 20-keV beams have been achieved.