ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
Arthur W. Dalton
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 3 | November 1987 | Pages 409-415
Technical Paper | Tritium System | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25072
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A cylinder of natural lithium carbonate, supported on a slab of graphite, was irradiated from above by a low-intensity source of 14-MeV neutrons and the tritium produced within it subsequently determined from measurements of beta activity. Results obtained for small lithium carbonate detectors highly enriched in 6Li (96%) or 7Li (99.9%) at six positions along the cylinder axis were compared with predictions based on three-dimensional Monte Carlo calculations and multi-group cross-section data. The experimental accuracy was sufficient to detect deviations from theory > 7% with a 95% level of confidence. On this basis, good agreement with theoretical predictions was obtained for the 7Li results. For the 6Li data, however, significant differences were observed in the lower half of the assembly. A detailed analysis indicated that these deviations could not be explained in terms of conceivable environmental perturbations of the neutron flux and may arise as a consequence of inadequate representation of anisotropic neutron scattering.