ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Ge-Ping Yu
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 1 | July 1987 | Pages 137-144
Technical Paper | Materials Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25057
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analysis based on available materials property data has been performed to compare the inelastic response of first-wall structural materials. The first wall is assumed to be operated under the conditions of the pulse surface heat load, coolant pressure, and bombardment from energetic particles. An axisymmetric inelastic stress analysis calculates the long-term redistribution of the stress in a thin-walled plate element of a cylindrical module that is subjected to membrane load. The plate is free to expand but is constrained from bending. The redistribution is caused by inelastic deformation from irradiation creep and swelling. The present effort has concentrated on the performance of two candidate structural materials, namely, Type 316 stainless steel and HT-9 ferritic steel. The results obtained indicate a lower cyclic stress and a lower mean stress for the HT-9 ferritic steel than for stainless steel under the conditions of interest. Therefore HT-9 ferritic steel is quite attractive for future application of the fusion reactor first wall.