ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
M.Z. Youssef, C. Gung, M. Nakagawa, T. Mori, K. Kosako, T. Nakamura
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 10 | Number 3 | November 1986 | Pages 549-563
Fusion Nucleonics Experiments | Proceedings of the Seveth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Reno, Nevada, June 15–19, 1986) | doi.org/10.13182/FST86-A24803
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Phase I integral experiments of U.S./JAERI Collaborative Program on Fusion Breeder Neutronics which were carried out at the Fusion Neutronics Source (FNS) facility at JAERI ranged from D-T neutron source characterization experiments, tritium production rate (TPR) measurements in a reference Li2O assembly, first wall experiments with and without coolant simulation and beryllium neutron multiplier experiments in various configurations. Both U.S. and Japan have independently analyzed these experiments using their own data base and codes. Analytical predictions obtained by both countries were compared to measured values. Results of this intercomparison is presented in this paper.