ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Robert T. McGrath, C. Christopher Klepper, Taner Uckan, Peter K. Mioduszewski
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 14 | Number 2 | September 1988 | Pages 339-353
Technical Paper | Divertor/Limiter System | doi.org/10.13182/FST88-A20266
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The relative positioning of the limiter modules on Tore Supra is investigated with the objective of optimizing the overall performance of the system and the operational flexibility of the experiment. Limiter system performance is optimized by simultaneously maximizing the power handling and particle exhaust capabilities. This must be accomplished for the entire range of edge q values anticipated on Tore Supra. In addition, it is desirable to independently maximize power handling, to allow operation at very high levels of plasma auxiliary heating, or particle exhaust, to allow operation at high pellet injection fueling rates. The relative merit of one configuration with respect to another is determined using a diffusion model for charged-particle radial transport coupled with a detailed three-dimensional mapping of the magnetic field structure in the edge plasma region. To implement the model, assumptions must be made about the edge plasma conditions including the rate of charged-particle diffusion. These assumptions affect the absolute values of the power handling and particle exhaust capabilities of the system but do not affect the merit of one configuration relative to another. Working within the constraints imposed by the availability of ports on Tore Supra, the best limiter configuration for a system of seven modular limiters is identified. The performance to be expected for this optimized configuration for various modes of Tore Supra operation is reported. Very long flux tubes must be avoided if the limiter system is to operate near its full design capacity of 8.0 MW. For the assumed edge conditions, Böhm diffusion with a plasma temperature of 150 eV at the last closed flux surf ace, the configuration identified can exhaust between 17 and 21 Torr · ℓ/s while removing 5 to 8 MW of power incident on the limiter surfaces. Operational modes that pump as much as 26 Torr · ℓ/s are also possible if incident power levels are reduced to 4.0 MW. Operation with large amounts of auxiliary heating, in excess of 15 MW, is also possible by power sharing with the actively cooled inner bumper limiter. In this situation, particle pumping rates may be as low as 9 Torr · ℓ/s.